Natural gas prices post weekly gain, after two weeks of losses
The April Henry Hub contract expired this week at $3.95/MMbtu, making May the new prompt contract. Winter ‘25/’26 lost 5c to finish the week at $4.94/MMbtu, while Summer ’26 gained 5c at $4.14/MMbtu. The EIA reported another storage build, while natural gas power demand could skew to the downside this summer.
The EIA reported an injection of 37 Bcf, bringing total US inventories to 1,744 Bcf. The injection season started earlier than usual this year, driven by warmer-than-average weather in March. This has resulted in the deficit to the five-year average shrinking to -122 Bcf. With the next two weeks of weather and the ten-year average weather beyond that, our modeling indicates that storage levels could rise to the five-year average by the end of May, potentially concluding the injection season above average.
Higher gas prices could lead to a reduction in power sector gas demand this summer. Typically, as gas prices rise, power generators consume less gas relative to coal. Our estimates, given current summer prices and assuming normal weather, show that gas power demand could be materially lower if prices remain elevated. This would result in larger storage injections and contribute to our projection of gas inventories.
AEGIS recommends clients use swaps for the nearby contract months, while collars may be preferable in Winter. Summer ’26 and Summer ’27 remain in call skew, which may make collars preferable for these periods as well.
Natural Gas Factors
Price Trend. (Bullish, Priced In) Gas prices have surged to multi-year highs, with the April 2025 NYMEX contract reaching $4.899.
S&D Balance. (Mostly Bullish, Priced In)
Long Range Weather Forecast. (Bearish, Surprise) Current long-term weather forecasts show temperatures are expected to be above average this winter. Although, it is important to note that the accuracy of long-range forecasts can be low.
Super-warm La Niña Novembers have led to mixed December outcomes, ranging from colder-than-normal to notably warmer. The warmest November (2001) was followed by a warm December, while the second warmest (2016) led to a colder December. Historical data groups these into three December outcomes: colder than CWG (2016), near CWG (2020, 1999), and warmer than CWG (2011, 2001), often influenced by a positive Eastern Pacific Oscillation (+EPO). Current conditions show a weak La Niña, similar to 2020 but with notable differences in ocean temperatures. The CWG outlook remains warmer than the 30-year average but cooler than the 10-year average. The NOAA model suggests a pattern resembling 2016, implying a possible cold December and warm Q1 2025, while a warmer December could mean more cold volatility in early 2025.
1-15 Day Weather. (Bullish, Priced In) Two-week forecasts have supported prices lately, with this January being the third coldest of the past 25 years.
Storage Level. (Mostly Bearish, Priced In) The storage level is a bearish priced-in factor due to the high levels of gas in inventories relative to the five-year average. According to the latest EIA weekly natural gas inventory report, the surplus to the five-year average stands at 21 Bcf above the five-year average and 20 Bcf above last year.
Dry Gas Production. (Bearish, Surprise) These are the most critical drivers of gas prices outside of weather. A material increase in either would pressure prices lower and loosen the supply-demand balance. These are also longer-lasting factors that can weigh on prices for years. Since the start of 2024, gas production has fallen sharply, driven by substantial curtailments and seasonal declines in Appalachia. Given low gas prices, producers may continue to curtail gas production until economics improve. A material drop in production could improve storage balances, but if prices begin to improve, there is a large amount of supply that can be brought back to market, which would be a bearish risk. With some evidence that production is now returning to the market, the dry gas curtailment bubble has been shifted to the bearish quadrant. A large amount of production was likely taken offline this year, which is now waiting to come back. Some operators may also have been drilling and completing wells during this time, which are ready to flow gas if economics have improved enough.
Associated Gas Production.(Bearish, Priced In) With oil prices remaining high and additional egress capacity coming to the Permian in the form of the Matterhorn pipeline, associated gas production may continue to grow in 2024. The Matterhorn pipe will send an additional 2.5 Bcf/d to the Gulf Coast, posing a bearish risk to Henry Hub and regional basis prices such as Houston Ship Channel.
Renewables. (Mostly Bearish, Partly Priced In) Renewables remain a perennial threat to gas prices and gas's share of the power stack. Renewable capacity additions in 2023 are expected to set a new record and are now the second-most prevalent source of electricity generation. Still, renewables have proven unreliable at times, which has exacerbated the global energy squeeze as gas usually serves as a flex-fuel when other sources underperform. We think this is priced in, but the effect at the summer peaks on gas generation has some bearish potential.
LNG Outages. (Bearish, Surprise) Feed-gas levels are at their near max capacity, and if there's any unplanned maintenance event or an outage, it might act as a surprise bearish factor for natural gas prices.
Slow Supply Response. (Bullish, Surprise) If production remains near where it is currently and does not grow into winter, this would be a bullish factor for gas prices. Typically, the Northeast region sees higher production receipts in the higher-demand months of the year. Still, due to lower activity levels over the past year, production growth may be more muted.
LNG Schedule. (Bullish, Surprise) With a significant amount of new LNG feedgas demand coming this year and the next few years, if these facilities startup sooner than anticipated it should be a bullish factor for gas prices. One example of this occuring is the recent startup of Plaquemines LNG, which saw feedgas levels reach more than 1 Bcf/d much sooner than anticipated.
Production Front-Running. (Bearish, Surprise) If producers begin to ramp up gas production in advance of the new LNG demand, this could lead to a temporary mismatch between supply and demand and weaken gas prices. The other option would involve producers waiting for a price signal from the market before increasing output.
Hedge Activity. (Bullish, Surprise) Following the sharp rally in January, many producers may have taken advantage of the higher prices and layered in more hedge volumes. This could result in less selling pressure down the curve if they are more adequelty hedged now.
Commodity Interest Trading involves risk and, therefore, is not appropriate for all persons; failure to manage commercial risk by engaging in some form of hedging also involves risk. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. There is no guarantee that hedge program objectives will be achieved. Certain information contained in this research may constitute forward-looking terminology, such as “edge,” “advantage,” ‘opportunity,” “believe,” or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. Such statements and opinions are not guarantees of future performance or activities. Neither this trading advisor nor any of its trading principals offer a trading program to clients, nor do they propose guiding or directing a commodity interest account for any client based on any such trading program.